T&D+Life

by Kurt Borne

Archive for the month “March, 2012”

Do Our Kids Have A Future?

Wow! For a few years now we’ve been reading story after story about the dismal economy. And yes, I am concerned enough about myself. But I feel confident that if I continue to show my value to my employer, things will be just fine.

It’s my children that I really worry about. With a son in high school and a daughter in middle school, I worry about them making all the right moves to make their career starts successful.

So what can a concerned parent do? Well, here are a few things my wife and I have done, and a couple of added factors leaning in their favor:

- My wife and I have very closely monitored our kids’ progress in school, from grades K-6 specifically. After that, they have shown the discipline instilled in them to pretty well succeed on their own.

- Make the kids do chores on a regular, set schedule. Yes, we do give a modest allowance, but nothing exorbitant. I think this helps to instill a work ethic and learning the value of a dollar.

- We do not buy our kids whatever they want on a whim. We do treat our kids now and then, but not every little (or big) thing they ask for. Also, if they want something expensive, ridiculous, or both, they have to save their own money to make the purchase (e.g. a two-wheeled skateboard, expensive gym shoes).

- We laid down the ultimatum that they must have some kind of job (working for family or relatives doesn’t count) by age 16. If they know this several years in advance, they know that it is a reality that WILL happen, without exception. Some parents would argue that 16 is too young, others too old, which is okay. We just felt that we needed to make our expectations very clear on this. And no, playing sports does not excuse you from this expectation. Even mowing the lawn for a neighbor counts as a job, and any teenager can squeeze that in during summer vacation.

- My kids’ competition for jobs is pretty light, I think, judging from the lazy and spoiled attitudes of their counterparts.

-  Beginning when they are very young, keep talking to the kids about school, work, careers, and work ethic.

- Keep abreast of the trends in careers with growth potential, and give that information to your kids. They need to know what careers and college majors have the most potential, and which ones are dead ends.

And so here we are at the point when my son, after much nagging, finally got his first “real” job, so I consider that to be the first big step behind us. And his much younger sister, who is more desirous of money, is working on her babysitting brochure as we speak.

If you read the following articles, and others like them, things do not look good for today’s youth. But I will never give up on the idea that if they want to work, and have a strong work ethic and character, kids can succeed even in these trying times.

Employment Rate For Young Adults Lowest In 60 Years, Study SaysHuffington Post – 4/12/12

Digital Natives vs. Immigrants: Reality or Myth?

I ran across an interesting article deriding the concept of digital natives vs. digital immigrants titled, “The Fallacy of Digital Natives” by Dan Pontefract.

Since my current graduate class is using the text Teaching Digital Natives: Partnering for Real Learning, by Marc Prensky, I found this opposing point of view interesting. Pontefract argues that just because one generation is more tech savvy than another (Millennials vs. Baby Boomers, for example), does not have any connection to their preferred learning style. He chides Prensky and Don Tapscott for propagating this oversimplified myth. Pontefract writes:

The so-called Net Generation (as Tapscott describes them) may in fact be somewhat technology savvier than their GenX or Baby Boomer ancestors, but it doesn’t mean a) they actually prefer learning in an all-digital way or b) that older users aren’t using technology to augment their learning styles the same way in which Millennials are. Sure, there may be a larger percentage of Millennials that tap into technology first compared to their elders, but oversimplifying the division of generations to suggest one prefers an all-technology learning style whilst the others use it when necessary is preposterous.

I agree with this analysis to some extent, but I view it a bit differently. I agree with the obvious fact that because Millennials were born into the technological age, they would certainly be more comfortable in learning with technology, at least moreso than Baby Boomers. But let’s take it a step further. Would all Millennials be comfortable learning from a Mac instead of a PC? Would they all prefer a podcast over a webcast? PowerPoint over Visio?

My point is that it’s not as simple and clear cut as some of the experts make it out to be. Everyone, even Millenials, have their own unique preferences and knowledge/skills backgrounds to consider. A Millennial who has never used a Mac would certainly not be comfortable in that environment.

I think the overriding thing to consider is that each individual learner has his or her own unique preference of learning style. The key is to give them the freedom to choose that learning style, rather than to be forced into something foreign to them, Millennials and Baby Boomers alike.

Read the The Fallacy of Digital Natives article for Pontefract’s interesting take on digital natives.

The Surprising Science of Motivation

I just viewed this interesting video on Career Analyst Dan Pink discussing the Science of Motivation. He discusses what he calls a ”mismatch between what science knows and what business does” in terms of human motivation. Those 20th Century motivators, says Pink, those rewards that we think are a natural part of business, work less and less in the 21st Century. The “if-then” rewards in current business environments often destroy creativity. He says that the secret to high performance are not attained through rewards and punishments, but rather that “unseen intrinsic drive, the drive to do things for their own sake, the drive to do things because they matter.”

Pink suggests that a new operating system is at play today, one that revolves around three elements: autonomy, mastery, and purpose. He uses the example of how Encarta Encyclopedia was created and its success, versus how Wikipedia was created and its ongoing success. Pink compares the old “carrot and stick” motivation techniques versus motivation by autonomy, mastery, and purpose.

It is definitely worth a view, because I’m sure that you, like me, see too much of the old “carrot and stick” approach still in play in our workplaces.

Watch the The Surprising Science of Motivation video and give me your opinion.

Deloitte Survey: Qualified Workers, Not Jobs, Are Lacking

28 Feb 2012: A recent survey suggests U.S. manufacturing isn’t being threatened by imports, but by the fact that because employers here can’t find qualified workers,… Read the story here.

What a sad state of affairs in the U.S. education system, that with unemployment as high as it is today, manufacturing jobs go unfilled due to lack of education. I first heard about this story when our local community college — Gateway Community and Technical College (which is mentioned in this story) – took to the airwaves to try to recruit students to take their two-year program, so that manufacturing jobs could be filled. The college said that businesses are coming to them specifically looking for students with those skills and degrees, and that they are “ready to hire immediately.” But the college simply isn’t getting enough students to fill this demand.

How many other college degree programs can guarantee employment immediately after graduation, if not sooner? All this, I remind you again, while our unemployment is above 8% (almost twice that if you count those who have given up looking for work). And I saw in a report from Fall 2011 that the unemployment rate is over 18% among people under age 25.

How does that calculate? Over 18% unemployment among our youth, yet highly skilled manufacturing jobs are going unfilled. And all that’s needed is a two-year community college degree. Oh, and the story mentions that these jobs could earn upwards of $50,000 in just five years, $100,000 in ten years.

I’ll be blunt in my opinion: What is wrong with our youth today?

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.